A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: The BATTLE Trial

Therapy and Intervention

A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial

Lancet.

Gray WA, Keirse K, Soga Y, Benko A, Babaev A, Yokoi Y, Schroeder H, Prem JT, Holden A, Popma J, Jaff MR, Diaz-Cartelle J, Müller-Hülsbeck S; IMPERIAL investigators

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736

Cardiac Arrest or DeathMyocardial InfarctionThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial

Lancet.

Brilakis ES, Edson R, Bhatt DL, Goldman S, Holmes DR Jr, Rao SV, Shunk K, Rangan BV, Mavromatis K, Ramanathan K, Bavry AA, Garcia S, Latif F, Armstrong E, Jneid H, Conner TA, Wagner T, Karacsonyi J, Uyeda L, Ventura B, Alsleben A, Lu Y, Shih MC, Banerjee S; DIVA Trial Investigators

doi: 10.1016/

Heart, Artery and Coronary DiseasesTherapy and Intervention

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Lancet.

Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, Massaro JM, Doros G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators

doi: 10.1016/S0140-

Cardiac Arrest or DeathAtrial FibrillationMyocardial InfarctionThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

Safety and Efficacy of Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Orally Anticoagulated Patients: 2-Year Results of the LEADERS FREE Oral Anticoagulation Substudy

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

Carrié D, Menown I, Oldroyd K, Copt S, Talwar S, Maillard L, Morice MC, Teik LS, Lang I, Urban P

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.033.

Heart, Artery and Coronary Diseases

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

Lancet.

Pilgrim T, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Tüller D, Muller O, Moarof I, Siontis GCM, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Hunziker L, Eberli FR, Jüni P, Windecker S

doi: 10.1016/

Myocardial InfarctionThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Lancet.

de Winter RJ, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Milewski KP, Lurz P, Buszman P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Ophuis TO, Wöhrle J, Wyderka R, Cayla G, Hofma SH, Levesque S, Żurakowski A, Fischer D, Kośmider M, Goube P, Arkenbout EK, Noutsias M, Ferrari MW, Onuma Y, Wijns W, Serruys PW

doi: 10.1016/

Myocardial InfarctionTherapy and Intervention

Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial

Lancet.

Iglesias JF, Muller O, Heg D, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Moarof I, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Tapponnier M, Stortecky S, Losdat S, Eeckhout E, Valgimigli M, Odutayo A, Zwahlen M, Jüni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X.

Therapy and Intervention

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

Circ Cardiovasc Interv.

Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Kogame N, Buszman P, Lurz P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Oude Ophuis T, Milewski KP, Hofma SH, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, de Winter RJ, Wijns W

doi: 10.

Myocardial Infarction

Cost-effectiveness of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An analysis from the EXAMINATION randomized controlled trial

PLoS One.

Schur N, Brugaletta S, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Mainar V, Campo G, Tespili M, den Heijer P, Bethencourt A, Vazquez N, Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Ademi Z, Schwenkglenks M, Sabaté M

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.

Related content

A polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) versus a polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX) for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention (IMPERIAL): a randomised, non-inferiority trial

Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Safety and Efficacy of Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Orally Anticoagulated Patients: 2-Year Results of the LEADERS FREE Oral Anticoagulation Substudy

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

Cost-effectiveness of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An analysis from the EXAMINATION randomized controlled trial