Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final&#xA0;2-Year&#xA0;Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial

Heart, Artery and Coronary Diseases

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

Lancet.

Pilgrim T, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Tüller D, Muller O, Moarof I, Siontis GCM, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Hunziker L, Eberli FR, Jüni P, Windecker S

doi: 10.1016/

Therapy and Intervention

Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

J Am Heart Assoc.

Iglesias JF, Heg D, Roffi M, Tüller D, Lanz J, Rigamonti F, Muller O, Moarof I, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T

doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013607.

Myocardial InfarctionTherapy and Intervention

Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial

Lancet.

Iglesias JF, Muller O, Heg D, Roffi M, Kurz DJ, Moarof I, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Tapponnier M, Stortecky S, Losdat S, Eeckhout E, Valgimigli M, Odutayo A, Zwahlen M, Jüni P, Windecker S, Pilgrim T

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X.

Heart, Artery and Coronary DiseasesThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

Lefèvre T, Haude M, Neumann FJ, Stangl K, Skurk C, Slagboom T, Sabaté M, Goicolea J, Barragan P, Cook S, Macia JC, Windecker S

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.014.

Therapy and Intervention

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

Circ Cardiovasc Interv.

Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Kogame N, Buszman P, Lurz P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Oude Ophuis T, Milewski KP, Hofma SH, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, de Winter RJ, Wijns W

doi: 10.

Therapy and Intervention

10-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

J Am Coll Cardiol.

Kufner S, Ernst M, Cassese S, Joner M, Mayer K, Colleran R, Koppara T, Xhepa E, Koch T, Wiebe J, Ibrahim T, Fusaro M, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Byrne RA, ISAR-TEST-5 Investigators.

doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.026.

Therapy and Intervention

Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable- or Durable-Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

Buiten RA, Ploumen EH, Zocca P, Doggen CJM, Danse PW, Schotborgh CE, Scholte M, van Houwelingen KG, Stoel MG, Hartmann M, Tjon Joe Gin RM, Somi S, Linssen GCM, Kok MM, von Birgelen C

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.054.

Heart, Artery and Coronary DiseasesTherapy and Intervention

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Lancet.

Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, Massaro JM, Doros G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators

doi: 10.1016/S0140-

Myocardial InfarctionThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Lancet.

de Winter RJ, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Milewski KP, Lurz P, Buszman P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Ophuis TO, Wöhrle J, Wyderka R, Cayla G, Hofma SH, Levesque S, Żurakowski A, Fischer D, Kośmider M, Goube P, Arkenbout EK, Noutsias M, Ferrari MW, Onuma Y, Wijns W, Serruys PW

doi: 10.1016/

Cardiovascular

Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final 2-Year Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial

Related content

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial

Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

10-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Polymer-Free Versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable- or Durable-Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial