3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial

Therapy and Intervention

Clinical Outcomes Prior to and Following Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial

Circulation.

Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, Tan SH, Ediebah DE, Simonton C, Stone GW, ABSORB III Investigators.

doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.

Myocardial InfarctionThrombosis and Stroke

2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy

doi: 10.1016/

Therapy and Intervention

Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial

Lancet.

Stone GW, Ellis SG, Gori T, Metzger DC, Stein B, Erickson M, Torzewski J, Williams J Jr, Lawson W, Broderick TM, Kabour A, Piegari G, Cavendish J, Bertolet B, Choi JW, Marx SO, Généreux P, Kereiakes DJ; ABSORB IV Investigators

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736

Heart, Artery and Coronary Diseases

3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the RIBS IV Clinical Trial: A Prospective Randomized Study of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Arteries Previously Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

Alfonso F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Cuesta J, García Del Blanco B, García-Touchard A, López-Mínguez JR, Masotti M, Zueco J, Cequier A, Velázquez M, Moreno R, Mainar V, Domínguez A, Moris C, Molina E, Rivero F, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Gonzalo N, Fernández-Pérez C; RIBS IV Study Investigators (Under the Auspices of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology)

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.037.

Therapy and Intervention

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

Circ Cardiovasc Interv.

Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Kogame N, Buszman P, Lurz P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Oude Ophuis T, Milewski KP, Hofma SH, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, de Winter RJ, Wijns W

doi: 10.

Heart, Artery and Coronary DiseasesTherapy and Intervention

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Lancet.

Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, Massaro JM, Doros G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Bennett J, Roguin A, Gharib EG, Cutlip DE, Waksman R; BIOFLOW V Investigators

doi: 10.1016/S0140-

Heart, Artery and Coronary Diseases

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

Lancet.

Pilgrim T, Piccolo R, Heg D, Roffi M, Tüller D, Muller O, Moarof I, Siontis GCM, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Cuculi F, Hunziker L, Eberli FR, Jüni P, Windecker S

doi: 10.1016/

Therapy and Intervention

Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve During 3 Years Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Metallic Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The VANISH Trial

JACC Cardiovasc Interv.

Stuijfzand WJ, Schumacher SP, Driessen RS, Lammertsma AA, Bakker AL, Rijnierse MT, van Rossum AC, van de Ven PM, Nap A, Appelman Y, van Royen N, van Leeuwen MA, Lemkes JS, Raijmakers PG, Knaapen P

doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.004.

Myocardial InfarctionThrombosis and StrokeTherapy and Intervention

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Lancet.

de Winter RJ, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Milewski KP, Lurz P, Buszman P, Jessurun GAJ, Koch KT, Troquay RPT, Hamer BJB, Ophuis TO, Wöhrle J, Wyderka R, Cayla G, Hofma SH, Levesque S, Żurakowski A, Fischer D, Kośmider M, Goube P, Arkenbout EK, Noutsias M, Ferrari MW, Onuma Y, Wijns W, Serruys PW

doi: 10.1016/

Related content

Clinical Outcomes Prior to and Following Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial

2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy

Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial

3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the RIBS IV Clinical Trial: A Prospective Randomized Study of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Arteries Previously Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents

Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights From the DESSOLVE III All-Comers Randomized Trial

Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial

Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial

Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve During 3 Years Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Metallic Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The VANISH Trial

A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial